DISCUSS THE DAVIS-MOORE THESIS OF STRATIFICATION AND MERITOCRACY

0 Comments

Modern societies allocated their collective labor forces inefficiently, wasting talented but poor people in humble positions and suffering from the inept sons of the privileged in powerful positions. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Opportunities for achievement are not distributed equally. Tumin states see Levine, p. This argument has been criticized as fallacious from a number of different angles. Summary of the Davis-Moore Thesis: Society must distribute its members among the various positions in society.

Talented and trained individuals are scarce because acquisition of training and skills requires people to be sufficiently motivated to pursue them. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Inept progeny of rich tycoons took over companies while intelligent children of workers went uneducated. There is in stratification systems artificial limits to the development of whatever potential skills there are in society. The most important positions are rewarded the most–the least important are rewarded the least. Once the roles are filled, the division of labour functions properly, based on the notion of organic solidarity advanced by Emile Durkheim. As a structural functionalist theory, it is also associated with Talcott Parsons and Robert K.

The Functionalist View of Stratification:

It is argued that if abilities were inherent, there would be no need tye a reward system. The distribution of positions cannot be understood merely by achievement but achievement itself is conditioned by ascription of status.

Opportunities for achievement are not distributed equally. Main principles of structural functionalism: Davis and Moore argue that the most difficult jobs stratificatuon any society are the most necessary and require the highest rewards and compensation to sufficiently motivate individuals to fill them.

  DISSERTATION LINTERNATIONALISATION DU DROIT PÉNAL

Davis–Moore hypothesis

Secondly, Davis and Moore do not clearly indicate why some positions should be worth more than others, other than the fact that they meritoctacy remunerated more, claiming, for example, that teachers are equally, if not more, functionally necessary than athletes and movie stars, yet, they receive significantly lower incomes. Once the roles are filled, the division of labour functions properly, based on the notion of organic solidarity advanced by Emile Durkheim.

discuss the davis-moore thesis of stratification and meritocracy

We must also consider the problem of deskilling and the control of workers see Braverman –the detailed division of labor. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Talented and trained individuals are scarce because acquisition of training and skills requires davis-mooore to be sufficiently motivated to pursue them. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. So, inequality is universal.

Davis–Moore hypothesis – Wikipedia

It must solve the problem of motivation at two levels: Scarcity of talent is not an adequate explanation of stratification. Summary of the Davis-Moore Thesis: Tumin states see Levine, p. Criticism of the Davis-Moore Thesis: Each part of a society exists because it has a vital function to perform in maintaining the existence or stability of society as a whole; the existence of any part of a society is therefore explained when its function for the whole is identified.

Davis and Moore argue like this: Just because stratification is universal does not mean it is a vital aspect or system need of society. Filling the positions within a social structure is a basic need of any society. Society must distribute its members among the various positions in society.

  ESSAY PERAN MAHASISWA SEBAGAI AGENT OF CHANGE DAN SOCIAL CONTROL

Why are some positions in society higher than others? Not all positions are equally pleasant, equally importantor equal in terms of required talent and ability.

The Davis—Moore hypothesissometimes referred to as the Davis—Moore theoryis a central claim within the structural functionalist paradigm of sociological theory, and was advanced by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E.

The hypothesis is an attempted explanation of social stratificationbased on the idea of “functional necessity”. Societies are complex systems of interrelated and interdependent parts, and each part of a society significantly influences the others.

Why do the straatification positions carry more status and rewards? Moore in a paper published in Davis and Moore claimed that their theory was tje to all forms of society. The universality of stratification does not mean it is necessarily beneficial or inevitable. Some rewards are not functionally determined at all, but rather must be understood within the context of wealth ownership and institution of inheritance. As a structural functionalist theory, it is also associated with Talcott Parsons and Robert K.

Retrieved from ” https: This argument has been criticized as fallacious from a number of different angles.

discuss the davis-moore thesis of stratification and meritocracy

People have to be motivated to fill certain positions and perform their duties.